Sendix brings each child’s plan, reports and what staff know together, so you can see progress against every outcome and plan what comes next.
Sendix reads each Child’s Plan and IEP against Scottish guidance, shows what’s missing, and keeps the record of support ready for the review.
For SENCOs in primary, secondary, special and alternative provision schools, and for trusts.
For support for learning staff in primary, secondary and special schools, and for councils.
| Outcome | Evidence | Is the support working? |
|---|---|---|
| Answers a why question about a story | Two reports and class tracking11 of 12 sessions recorded | Support: Partly working |
| Asks an adult for help when stuck | Speech and language report10 of 12 sessions recorded | Support: Working |
| Settles to work after break | Class tracking and a teacher report4 of 12 sessions recorded | Support: Not working |
| Starts a task with one reminder | One note since SeptemberStarted in October | Support: Not enough evidence yet |
| Follows a visual timetable | Class tracking and parent views12 of 12 sessions recorded | Support: Achieved |
Five outcomesSuggested from the evidence. Staff decide the status.
| Target | What the check found | For the review |
|---|---|---|
| Develops their social skills | Doesn’t yet say how you’ll know | For the review: Needs your wording |
| Reads a short book with a partner | Says what, how often and by when | For the review: Ready |
| Asks an adult for help when stuck | This term’s support record | For the review: Record to check |
Three targetsChecked against the plan and guidance. Staff decide.
University of Dundee: Venture 2026 award winner (source: University of Dundee, 10 March 2026; opens in a new tab)
ESBF (formerly EIBF): Engineers and Scientists in Business Fellowship award, through Venture 2026 (source: University of Dundee, 10 March 2026 (as EIBF); opens in a new tab)
Techscaler: Techscaler Award, through Venture 2026 (source: University of Dundee, 10 March 2026; opens in a new tab)
Scottish EDGE: Young EDGE award winner, round 27 (source: Scottish EDGE; opens in a new tab)
DOHE Go-Together Accelerator: Place on cohort 28, an accelerator for education businesses (source: Go-Together on LinkedIn, 22 Sep 2026; opens in a new tab)
See who’s next and what each child’s review still needs.
Sendix finds what bears on each outcome, for it and against it.
A.M.’s annual reviewYear 5 · Review on 24 November
Read for this outcome
By the end of Year 6, A.M. answers a why question about a story, on their own.
The child’s name comes out first, and the model keeps nothing.
The evidence sits beside your view, and each line shows its source.
A.M.’s annual reviewYear 5 · Review on 24 November
By the end of Year 6, A.M. answers a why question about a story, on their own.
Delivery 11 of 12 story sessions recorded this term
Suggested from the evidence: Partly working
WorkingPartly workingNot workingNot enough evidence yetAchieved
Your reasonAnswers with a picture, not yet without one.
Your view, saved by C.B.
You choose what stays. Every draft comes from the reports and your staff.
A.M.’s annual reviewYear 5 · Review on 24 November
Current outcome
By the end of Year 6, A.M. answers a why question about a story, on their own.
Suggested change
By the end of Year 6, A.M. will answer a why question about a new story, without a picture, in four out of five story sessions, up from none this term.
Drafted from the speech and language report and what staff noticed
Drafted provision
Teaching assistant fades picture cues at story time, gap for your team: how often: to agree with the speech and language therapist.
Next check
Class teacher, at the end of the spring term.
KeepEditReject
Kept by C.B.
In your school’s own review template, ready to share with everyone invited, at least two weeks before the meeting.
A.M.’s annual reviewYear 5 · Review on 24 November
Preparation draft for the review meeting
A.M.’s views Likes the stories with pictures best.
Parent views Asks why at home, with books they know.
Outcome 1 of 5 Answers a why question about a story.
Is the support working? Partly working. Answers with a picture, not yet without one.
Evidence Speech and language report, class tracking, 11 of 12 sessions recorded.
What comes next Fade the picture at story time, then try new stories.
The meeting talks it through. Afterwards the school sends the report with its recommendations.
Draft checked by C.B.
More on how an EHCP annual review comes together, from the first report to the meeting.
See which plans are coming up for review and what each one still needs.
Sendix checks each target against Scottish guidance and shows what it doesn’t yet say.
A.M.’s IEP reviewP5 · Review on 24 November
From A.M.’s IEP
What this target doesn’t yet say
Education Scotland’s IEP guidance. Child’s Plans are checked against GIRFEC.
The child’s name comes out first, and the model keeps nothing.
Sendix asks the questions that close each gap. Your team knows the answers.
A.M.’s IEP reviewP5 · Review on 24 November
A.M. will develop their social skills.
Nothing changes until your team says so.
For IEPs, measurable wording built only from the plan, with gaps for your team.
A.M.’s IEP reviewP5 · Review on 24 November
Current target
A.M. will develop their social skills.
Suggested target
A.M. will join a small-group game at break with up to two classmates, supported by gap for your team: role, on gap for your team: number of 5 days a week by gap for your team: review date, up from gap for your team: days a week now. Measured by gap for your team: observation method, reviewed termly.
For A.M.
I will play a game with one or two friends at break, with gap for your team: role nearby.
Your team writes the wording for a Child’s Plan.
AcceptEditReject
Accepted, with gaps to fill
Agree the target with A.M. and their family, with the term’s support record beside it.
A.M.’s IEP reviewP5 · Review on 24 November
IEP draft for the review
Target A.M. will join a small-group game at break with up to two classmates.
To fill in Who supports them, how often and how it’s measured.
Support this term Delivered as planned, signed off by C.B.
With the council One request followed up, reply logged.
For A.M. I will play a game with one or two friends at break.
Next review Reviewed termly.
To agree at the review
A plan that says “as required” is hard to deliver and harder to review. Sendix marks vague wording, shows the guidance behind it, and suggests clearer wording from the child’s own reports. What you accept becomes a recommendation in your review report.
Review reportRecommendation
Provision
A.M. will receive speech and language support deleted: as required inserted: through vocabulary pre-teaching with a trained teaching assistant, 20 minutes, three times a week, in a group of up to four.
Accepted by the SENCO, from A.M.’s speech and language report
SEND Code of Practice, chapter 9 (opens the source in a new tab)Then keep the record: who delivers each provision, what happened each term, and a polite reminder you can send when support hasn’t arrived.
Sendix keeps the delivery record: who delivers each commitment, what happened each term, and a polite reminder you can send to the council.
Scottish plans use Scottish guidance throughout, with no English law applied. Sendix checks Child’s Plans and IEPs, and tracks delivery for Co-ordinated Support Plans too.
Sendix removes the pupil’s name, pupil number, NHS number, postcode and labelled full dates of birth before an AI model sees the text. The app, its data and the AI model run in the UK. The model keeps nothing, and your data never trains it.
What you add
Speech and language report
A.M., born 3 May 2017, answers a why question when a picture is there.
What the AI model reads
Speech and language report
[Pupil], born [date], answers a why question when a picture is there.
What you add
IEP, P5
A.M., born 3 May 2017, joins in when an adult sets up a game.
What the AI model reads
IEP, P5
[Pupil], born [date], joins in when an adult sets up a game.
Your school’s SENCOs and SEND Leads, and your trust’s SEND Lead where you have one, see plans in the app. Sendix administrator accounts can’t open them. Your school or trust stays in control of its data, under a data processing agreement.
Your school’s support leads see plans in the app. Sendix administrator accounts can’t open them. Your school or council stays in control of its data, under a data processing agreement.
From the first report to a draft ready to share with everyone invited, at least two weeks before the meeting.
From the first check to a draft for the review.
Prefer email? hello@sendix.ai, or use the form. We reply within two working days.